Renowned astronomer, physicist, and cosmologist, Robert Jastrow, wrote the following in his book, God and the Astronomers (first published in 1978):
“For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries”
If we are to predict whether or not Robert Jastrow’s ‘bad dream’ will actually unfold, we need to understand how far ‘up the mountain of ignorance’ science has progressed to date. We do this by first looking at the present paradigm which is responsible for the world we have created for ourselves.
A paradigm is a common or collective belief based on a set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitute a way of viewing reality for the society that shares them.
While each society may have their own particular paradigm, the belief that selfishness is a fait accompli underpins the paradigm of most societies. Selfishness is generally accepted by all societies as a human condition against which we must constantly struggle in order to keep it in check.
The general acceptance of this belief allows a critical mass1 of individuals in all societies to treat selfishness, and its consequences, in a very blasé manner – ‘it’s natural, what do you expect me to do about it’ attitude!!!
In the interest of balance and fairness it is necessary to state that there are many honest, hardworking, generous people in all walks of life – however, the significant point is that a critical mass in most societies are dominated by selfishness.
Since a critical mass in all societies are dominated by selfishness, it is logical to suggest that all institutions will be dominated by selfishness. Furthermore, individuals, especially the cunning ones, who frequently rise to the top in all institutions, can indulge in their selfish pursuits while hiding behind the bureaucracy of a faceless institution. In these situations selfishness usually gives way to greed and once that occurs, corruption and abuse of power will almost inevitably follow every time the opportunity presents itself. That is why all our political, public service, financial, and religious institutions worldwide are dominated by a culture of selfishness, corruption, abuse of power and greed (SCAG for short).
The SCAG culture, particularly in all our main institutions, creates a world of pain and suffering – for example poverty, starvation, conflict, war, racial/social/religious discrimination, terrorism, and so on. Even in affluent western democracies there are significant levels of poverty, struggle, violence, crime, and neglect of the vulnerable.
Obviously we will not progress far up ‘Robert Jastrow’s mountain’ on the back of our present paradigm. The next step, therefore, is to try to understand the scientific view of reality underpinning this paradigm.
The present scientific view of reality shown in Figure 1 indicates that the main influences informing human consciousness are mind, science, religion, and politics. There are, of course, other influences as well, such as art, music, literature, philosophy, etc, but these are usually voluntary, while we cannot live in a society that is not influenced/controlled by politics and religion, and influenced/informed by science. Of these four main influences, mind is the most dominant, as it directly influences human consciousness as well as religion, politics, and science.
Figure 1; The Present Scientific View of Reality
The significant points relevant to Figure 1 are as follows:
The argument thus far suggests that the present scientific view of reality supports the belief which underpins the present paradigm which in turn is responsible for creating our present world of pain and suffering, as described above. I believe that this argument strongly suggests that the present scientific view of reality will not empower us to reach the top of the mountain – we therefore require a new one.
I believe that scientists are on the cusp of a new understanding regarding the origin and evolution of the universe and life. A new scientific view of reality will then emerge from that new understanding.
Based on the concepts and arguments in my paper titled The Grand Interactive Model of Reality, I predict that the new scientific view of reality will be roughly as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: A New Scientific View of Reality
The significant points in this view of reality are as follows:
Empowered by this new view of reality, the scientists will ‘pull themselves over the final rock’; and to their dismay, ‘they will be greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries’.
Showing the theologians Figure 2 the scientists will say: – “it has taken us more than five hundred years to understand this view of reality – which empowered us to reach the top. How did you get here without it?”
The theologians will then show the scientists Figure 3, saying this is the view of reality that empowered us to reach the top centuries ago.
Figure 3: Theological View of Reality
Both groups will then sit down and compare the two views, and they will quickly conclude that they are synonymous – the two views express exactly the same view of reality, and differ only in terminology.
At last science and theology will have reached a common understanding.
However, even at that point there will be questions which are beyond human understanding, for example:
However we should not dwell on these questions now – rather we should work together to reach the top of the mountain at which point we will be much better able to address these questions.
Recent Comments